4.7 Article

Effect of casting solvent and annealing temperature on recast Nafion membranes for vanadium redox flow battery

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 522, 期 -, 页码 56-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.014

关键词

Solvents; Temperature; Nafion; Membrane; Vanadium battery

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571422]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT. NSRIF. 201707]
  3. Discipline Construction Guide Fund of Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai [WH20150203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of casting solvent and annealing temperature on microstructure, proton conductivity, vanadium permeability, mechanical properties as well as single cell performances of recast Nafion membranes for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) are conducted experimentally. Membranes are prepared from NMP (N-methly-2-pyrrolidone), DMF(dimethylformamide), DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and EtOH (ethanol/water), annealed at 100 degrees C, 140 degrees C and 180 degrees C, respectively. The micromorphology of recast Nafion membranes is thoroughly examined by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), scanning electron microscope (SEM), H-1 NMR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). It is found that the formation of Nafion membranes is strongly influenced by both temperature and solvent. Results show that solvent is a primary factor affecting the microstructure of recast membranes at lower temperature, but its effect is no longer distinct at higher temperature. EtOH-140 membranes has the highest proton conductivity, NMP-180 has the lowest vanadium permeability, DMF-180 has the smallest ionic cluster, DMSO-180 has the best mechanical properties among the recast Nafion membranes. Single cell tests show that DMF-180 has the best comprehensive cell performances, its capacity decay rate is even smaller than that of commercial Nafion 212 membrane after charge-discharged for 100 cycles at current density of 80 mA cm(-2). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据