4.7 Article

Cleaning strategies and membrane flux recovery on anti-fouling membranes for pressure retarded osmosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 522, 期 -, 页码 116-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.016

关键词

Osmotic power generation; Pressure-retarded osmosis; Hyperbranched polyglycerol grafting; Anti-fouling; Chemical cleaning

资金

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation, Singapore under Environment & Water Research Programme
  2. NUS [R-279-000-381-279, R-279-000-382-279]
  3. [1102-IRIS-11-01]
  4. [1102-IRIS-11-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study of cleaning procedures to maintain the anti-fouling properties is urgently needed to sustain high osmotic power density of the fouling resistant membranes in the pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process. Therefore, various cleaning agents were evaluated for a charged hyperbranched polyglycerol grafted thin-film composite (CHPG-TFC) membrane: (i) deionized (DI) water; (ii) a high pH alkaline solution, (iii) a low pH acid solution, and (iv) a chelating solution comprised of ethylenediaminete-traacetate (EDTA). Compared with other cleaning agents, the EDTA cleaning was more effective to restore the original surface of the CHPG-TFC membrane and sustain its osmotic power density using a real wastewater effluent as the feed. The power density was maintained at a stable range of 6.0-6.7 W/m(2) in three repeated PRO tests. In comparison, a non-modified PES-TFC membranes with EDTA cleaning showed a large fluctuation of power density from 3.6 to 4.8 W/m(2). Instrumental analyses were conducted to reveal the physicochemical relationship between cleanings and membrane properties. The investigations confirmed the effectiveness of EDTA cleaning to mitigate the sulfate scaling, silica fouling, and calcium deposition. In summary, the EDTA cleaning imparted good recovery to the anti-fouling properties of the CHPG-TFC membrane and maintained its resilience to foulants in osmotic power generation by PRO. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据