4.6 Article

A New Triple Bargaining Game-Based Energy Management Scheme for Hierarchical Smart Grids

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 161131-161140

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951499

关键词

Smart grids; Games; Energy management; Smart cities; Protocols; Sociology; Hierarchical smart-grids; Nash with claim solution; midpoint-constrained solution; proportional bargaining solution; triple cooperative game model

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), South Korea, through the Information Technology Research Center (ITRC) [IITP-2019-2018-0-01799]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2018R1D1A1A09081759]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper deals with the hierarchical structure of smart-grid systems. The major challenges of this structure are to balance electric power production and consumption within the hierarchical smart grid, and makes active use of the flexibility of a large number of power producing and consuming units. In this study, we present a new triple game based energy management scheme for the hierarchical smart-grid architecture. By using the Nash with claim, midpoint-constrained egalitarian and proportional bargaining solutions, the proposed approach can adaptively distribute the limited energy resource of smart-grid system. To reduce the computation complexity, these bargaining solutions are hierarchically applied based on the developed triple game model. According to the attractive characteristics of each bargaining solution, control decisions in our proposed scheme are mutually dependent on each other and can cause cascade interactions to reach a desirable system performance. The results obtained from the simulation analysis illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme compared with the existing state-of-the-art protocols. Finally, we conclude advantages of our triple game based energy management scheme and identify research areas for future study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据