3.8 Proceedings Paper

Fourier Transform Mid-Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy to Identify Tannin Compounds in The Panicle of Sorghum Mutant Lines

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/546/4/042045

关键词

FTIR; Mutant lines; Sorghum; Tannin

资金

  1. Center of Isotope and Radiation Application (CIRA) BATAN project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G5 and G8 are two sorghum mutant lines projected as sorghum varieties for ruminant's feed. However, most of the sorghum panicles contains phenolic compounds, especially in the form of condensed tannins. The objective of this research was to investigate the phenolic and tannin compounds from the panicles of two sorghum mutant lines. The second objective was to identify tannin content by Fourier Transform Mid-Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy in the sorghum panicles. The two mutant lines were compared with Pahat variety. This research was arranged into a randomized complete block design with two factors. The first factor was the sorghum variety/mutant lines, whereas the second factor was the generative phase of harvesting time (flowering, soft dough and hard dough). The results showed that the panicles of G5 sorghum contained the lowest total phenol compounds (P<0.01). The average mean of G5 and G8 mutant lines produced lower total tannin content (27.3 and 18.2%, respectively) than Pahat variety (P<0.01). Generally, total phenol and total tannin in all variety/mutant lines increased with the increasing maturity stage (P<0.01). All the spectra of the sorghum panicle samples in different harvesting age investigated shared certain special similarities. A band due to alkane medium (CH) stretch was observed at 2937-2854 cm(-1). At 1521-1514 and 1446-1408 cm(-1), a band due to the C-C aromatic compounds was observed. Based on those findings, it can be concluded that G5 and G8 mutant lines produced less total phenol and total tannin contents than Pahat variety. Meanwhile, FTIR could be used to describe the profile of tannin compounds qualitatively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据