4.6 Article

Quantum phases of canted dipolar bosons in a two-dimensional square optical lattice

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.053623

关键词

-

资金

  1. Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research
  2. UKIERIUGC Thematic Partnership [IND/CONT/G/16-17/73]
  3. National Science Centre, Poland [2016/21/B/ST2/01086]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider a minimal model to describe the quantum phases of ultracold dipolar bosons in two-dimensional square optical lattices. The model is a variation of the extended Bose-Hubbard model and apt to study the quantum phases arising from the variation in the tilt angle theta of the dipolar bosons. At low tilt angles, 0 degrees <= theta less than or similar to 25 degrees, the ground states of the system are phases with checkerboard order, which can be either checkerboard supersolids or checkerboard density waves. For high tilt angles, 35 degrees less than or similar to theta less than or similar to 55 degrees, phases with striped order of the supersolid or density wave are preferred. In the intermediate domain, 25 degrees less than or similar to theta less than or similar to 35 degrees, an emulsion or superfluid phase intervenes the transition between the checkerboard and the striped phases. The attractive interaction dominates at theta greater than or similar to 55 degrees, which renders the system unstable, and there is a density collapse. For our studies we use Gutzwiller mean-field theory to obtain the quantum phases and the phase boundaries. In addition, we calculate the phase boundaries between an incompressible and a compressible phase of the system by considering second-order perturbation analysis of the mean-field theory. The analytical results, where applicable, are in excellent agreement with the numerical results. In our study, the incompressible phases have an average occupancy per site rho <= 1, but the compressible phases can have rho > 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据