4.5 Article

Low Order Static Load Distribution Model for Ball Screw Mechanisms Including Effects of Lateral Deformation and Geometric Errors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
卷 140, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4038071

关键词

ball screw mechanism; static load distribution; low order model; finite element method; geometric error

资金

  1. Ford Motor Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate modeling of static load distribution of balls is very useful for proper design and sizing of ball screw mechanisms (BSMs); it is also a starting point in modeling the dynamics, e.g., friction behavior, of BSMs. Often, it is preferable to determine load distribution using low order models, as opposed to computationally unwieldy high order finite element (FE) models. However, existing low order static load distribution models for BSMs are inaccurate because they ignore the lateral (bending) deformations of screw/nut and do not adequately consider geometric errors, both of which significantly influence load distribution. This paper presents a low order static load distribution model for BSMs that incorporates lateral deformation and geometric error effects. The ball and groove surfaces of BSMs, including geometric errors, are described mathematically and used to establish a ball-to-groove contact model based on Hertzian contact theory. Effects of axial, torsional, and lateral deformations are incorporated into the contact model by representing the nut as a rigid body and the screw as beam FEs connected by a newly derived ball stiffness matrix which considers geometric errors. Benchmarked against a high order FE model in case studies, the proposed model is shown to be accurate in predicting static load distribution, while requiring much less computational time. Its ease-of-use and versatility for evaluating effects of sundry geometric errors, e.g., pitch errors and ball diameter variation, on static load distribution are also demonstrated. It is thus suitable for parametric studies and optimal design of BSMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据