4.5 Article

Social determinants of health in adults with type 2 diabetes-Contribution of mutable and immutable factors

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 110, 期 2, 页码 193-201

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.09.007

关键词

Diabetes; Social determinants; Socioeconomic; Psychological; Built environment

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease [K24DK093699-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Socioeconomic, psychosocial, and neighborhood factors influence clinical outcomes and self-care behaviors in diabetes; however, few studies simultaneously assessed the impact of multiple social determinant of health factors on glycemic control. We used an explanatory model to examine the differential contribution of social determinants and clinical factors on glycemic control. Secondarily, we examined the contribution of mutable and immutable factors to identify meaningful future interventions. Methods: Six hundred and fifteen adults with type 2 diabetes in the southeastern United States were recruited. A hierarchical model was run with HbA1c as the dependent variable and independent variables entered in blocks: demographics (block 1), socioeconomic (block 2), psychosocial (block 3), built environment (block 4), clinical (block 5), and knowledge/selfcare (block 6). Results: Significant associations for HbA1c included self-efficacy (beta = -0.10, p < 0.001), social support (beta = 0.01, p < 0.05), comorbidity (beta = -0.09, p < 0.05), insulin use (beta = 0.95, p < 0.001), medication adherence (beta = -0.11, p < 0.05), and being a former smoker (beta = 0.34, p < 0.05); accounting for 24.4% of the variance. Conclusions: Important factors that drive glycemic control are mutable, and amenable to health interventions. Greater attention should be given to interventions that increase self-efficacy and social support, reduce the burden of comorbidities, and enhance medication adherence and smoking cessation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据