4.7 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin in Older Participants in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 1145-1153

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc14-2868

关键词

-

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Janssen
  7. Merck
  8. Novo Nordisk
  9. Sanofi
  10. Servier
  11. Takeda
  12. TIMI Study Group
  13. Brigham and Women's Hospita from Abbott
  14. Amgen
  15. Bayer Healthcare
  16. Daiichi Sankyo
  17. Gilead
  18. Merck (SPRI)
  19. Novartis
  20. Pfizer
  21. Johnson Johnson
  22. Hadassah University Hospital from Novo Nordisk
  23. TIMI Study Group and Brigham and Women's Hospital from AstraZeneca
  24. Eisai
  25. Arena
  26. Boston Clinical Research Institute
  27. Covance
  28. Elsevier PracticeUpdate Cardiology
  29. Forest Pharmaceuticals
  30. Lexicon
  31. St. Jude Medical
  32. University of Calgary
  33. Amarin
  34. Ethicon
  35. Forest Laboratories
  36. Ischemix
  37. Medtronic
  38. Roche
  39. Medicines Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To examine the safety and cardiovascular (CV) effects of saxagliptin in the pre-defined elderly (>= 65 years) and very elderly (>= 75 years) subpopulations of the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53 (SAVOR-TIMI 53) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Individuals >= 40 years (n = 16,492; elderly, n = 8,561; very elderly, n = 2,330) with HbA(1c) >= 6.5% (47.5 mmol/mol) and <= 12.0% (107.7 mmol/mol) were randomized (1: 1) to saxagliptin (5 or 2.5 mg daily) or placebo in a double-blind trial for a median follow-up of 2.1 years. RESULTS The hazard ratio (HR) for the comparison of saxagliptin versus placebo for the primary end point (composite of CV mortality, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke) was 0.92 for elderly patients vs. 1.15 for patients <65 years (P = 0.06) and 0.95 for very elderly patients. The HRs for the secondary composite end points in the entire cohort, elderly cohort, and very elderly cohort were similar. Although saxagliptin increased the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in the overall saxagliptin population, there was no age-based treatment interaction (P = 0.76 for elderly patients vs. those <65 years; P = 0.34 for very elderly patients vs. those <75 years). Among saxagliptin-treated individuals with baseline HbA(1c) >= 7.6% (59.6 mmol/mol), the mean change from baseline HbA(1c) at 2 years was 20.69%, 20.64%, 20.66%, and 20.66% for those >= 65, <65, >= 75, and <75 years old, respectively. The incidence of overall adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar between saxagliptin and placebo in all cohorts; however, hypoglycemic events were higher for saxagliptin versus placebo regardless of age. CONCLUSIONS The SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial supports the overall CV safety of saxagliptin in a robust number of elderly and very elderly participants, although the risk of heart failure hospitalization was increased irrespective of age category. AEs and serious AEs as well as glycemic efficacy of saxagliptin in elderly patients are similar to those found in younger patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据