4.6 Article

Resonance energy transfer-assisted random lasing in light-harvesting bio-antenna enhanced with a plasmonic local field

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 65, 页码 37705-37713

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra08166f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science AMP
  2. Biotechnology, Government of West Bengal [332(Sanc.)/ST/P/S and T/16G-24/2018]
  3. TEQIP-III, CoE, GOI
  4. MHRD, NIT Durgapur, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thanks to the advent of the random laser, new light applications have opened up, ranging from biophotonic to security devices. Here, by using the well-known but unexplored light-harvesting bio-pigment of butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea, CT) flower extract, generation of continuous-wave (CW) random lasing at similar to 660 nm has been demonstrated. Furthermore, a wavelength tunability of similar to 30 nm in the lasing emission was obtained by utilizing the resonance energy transfer (RET) mechanism in a gain medium with a binary mixture of CT extract and a commercially available methylene blue (MB) dye as the gain medium. In the CT extract-dye mixture, the bio-pigments are acting as donors and the MB dye molecules are acting as acceptors. Amplification in intensity of the lasing emission of this binary system has further been achieved in the presence of optimized concentrations of metal (Ag)-semiconductor (ZnO) scattering nanoparticles. Interestingly, the lasing threshold has been reduced from 128 to 25 W cm(-2), with a narrowed emission peak just after loading of the Ag nanoplasmon in the ZnO-doped binary gain medium. Thanks to the strong localized electric field in the metal nanoplasmon, and the multiple scattering effects of ZnO, the lasing threshold was reduced by approximately four times compared to that of the gain medium without the use of scatterers. Thus, we believe that our findings on wavelength-tunable, non-toxic, biocompatible random lasing will open up new applications, including the design of low-cost biophotonic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据