4.7 Article

Effect of Growth Temperature on Carbon Nanotube Grafting Morphology and Mechanical Behavior of Carbon Fibers and Carbon/Carbon Composites

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.015

关键词

Carbon nanotubes; Carbon fibers; Chemical vapor deposition; Carbon/carbon composites; Mechanical strength

资金

  1. 111 Project of China [B08040]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51521061, 51472203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-purity carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with different orientation and lengths were grafted on carbon fibers (CFs) in woven fabrics by using double injection chemical vapor deposition and adjusting the growth temperature. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Raman investigations reveal that the grafted CNTs change from being predominantly aligned and uniform in diameter to absolutely disordered and variable in diameter, whilst they show significantly increased crystallinity, as the growth temperature is increased from730 degrees C to 870 degrees C. In tensile tests of fiber bundles, much more strength degradation of CFs was observed after the growth process at higher temperature than that at lower temperature. These hybrid preforms produced at different growth temperatures were used to reinforce carbon/carbon (C/C) composites. An increment of 34.4% in out-of-plane compressive strength (OCS) was obtained for the composites containing CNTs grown at 730 degrees C, while the OCS increment exhibits an obvious decrease with increasing the growth temperature. Compared with the higher growth temperature, the lower temperature contributes to the decrease in the strength loss of reinforcing fibers and meanwhile the growth of large extending length of CNTs, which can provide long reinforcement to the pyrocarbon matrix, and thus increase the compressive strength better. Copyright (C) 2017, The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology. Published by Elsevier Limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据