4.6 Article

Electrochemical in situ X-ray probing in lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 7, 页码 3697-3718

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-0732-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202603]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB934103]
  3. International Science AMP
  4. Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFA50840]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51521001, 51272197, 51302203]
  6. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51425204]
  7. Hubei Province Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [2014CFA035]
  8. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2015-PY-2, 2016III001, 2016III002, 2016III003, 2016III004, 2016III006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In situ X-ray diffraction (XRD), as a widely used tool in probing the structure evolution in electrochemical process as well as the energy storage and capacity fading mechanism, has shown great effects with optimizing and building better batteries. Based on the research progresses of in situ XRD in recent years, we give a review of the development and the utilization of this powerful tool in understanding the complex electrochemical mechanisms. The studies on in situ XRD are divided into three sections based on the reaction mechanisms: alloying, conversion, and intercalation reactions in lithium-ion batteries. The alloying reaction, in which lithium ions insert into Si, Sb, and Ge is firstly reviewed, followed by a discussion about the recent development of in situ XRD on conversion reaction materials (including metal oxides and metal sulfides) and intercalation reaction materials (including cathode materials and some structure-stable anode materials). As for sodium-ion batteries, we divide these researches on structure evolution into two categories: cathode and anode materials. Finally, the future development of in situ XRD is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据