4.7 Article

Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression and Risk of Vascular Events in People With Diabetes: Results From the PROG-IMT Collaboration

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 38, 期 10, 页码 1921-1929

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc14-2732

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI
  2. Pustertaler Verein zur Praevention von Herz- und Hirngefaesserkrankungen, Gesundheitsbezirk Bruneck
  3. Assessorat fuer Gesundheit, Province of Bolzano, Italy
  4. Stiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe
  5. NHLBI [N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, N01-HC-15103, N01-HC-55222, U01-HL-080295]
  6. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
  7. NINDS [R37-NS-029993]
  8. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [R01-DE-13094]
  9. AOK Bayern
  10. Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research (NWO), ZonMw [Vici 918-76-619]
  11. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Lo 1569/2-1, Lo 1569/2-3]
  12. MRC [MR/L003120/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. British Heart Foundation [RG/08/014/24067] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Medical Research Council [MR/L003120/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10165] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVECarotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a marker of subclinical organ damage and predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in the general population. It has also been associated with vascular risk in people with diabetes. However, the association of CIMT change in repeated examinations with subsequent CVD events is uncertain, and its use as a surrogate end point in clinical trials is controversial. We aimed at determining the relation of CIMT change to CVD events in people with diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIn a comprehensive meta-analysis of individual participant data, we collated data from 3,902 adults (age 33-92 years) with type 2 diabetes from 21 population-based cohorts. We calculated the hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) difference in mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) or in CCA-IMT progression, both calculated from two examinations on average 3.6 years apart, for each cohort, and combined the estimates with random-effects meta-analysis.RESULTSAverage mean CCA-IMT ranged from 0.72 to 0.97 mm across cohorts in people with diabetes. The HR of CVD events was 1.22 (95% CI 1.12-1.33) per SD difference in mean CCA-IMT, after adjustment for age, sex, and cardiometabolic risk factors. Average mean CCA-IMT progression in people with diabetes ranged between -0.09 and 0.04 mm/year. The HR per SD difference in mean CCA-IMT progression was 0.99 (0.91-1.08).CONCLUSIONSDespite reproducing the association between CIMT level and vascular risk in subjects with diabetes, we did not find an association between CIMT change and vascular risk. These results do not support the use of CIMT progression as a surrogate end point in clinical trials in people with diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据