4.6 Article

Ultrathin nickel hydroxide nanosheets with a porous structure for efficient electrocatalytic urea oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 46, 页码 26364-26370

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta06887b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675093, 41573103, 21422504, 21805149]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China [ZR2018BB012, 2015ZRB01A0D]
  3. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province of China [ts20110829]
  4. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province of China [2017GSF16105, 2018GGX102004]
  5. Taishan Scholar Advantage and Characteristic Discipline Team of Eco-chemical Process and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The direct urea fuel cell (DUFC) is a renewable technology for energy production, but largely limited by the intrinsically sluggish kinetics of the urea oxidation reaction (UOR) due to the complex six-electron transfer process, which severely hampers its commercial utilization. Herein, ultrathin beta-Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets with a porous structure were constructed to increase both the active surface area and the reactivity of active sites of catalysts, providing great opportunities for promoting the electrocatalytic UOR process. Theoretical investigations showed that the existence of abundant pores in ultrathin beta-Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets could reduce the adsorption energy of urea molecules on the catalyst surface, thus leading to a highly efficient catalytic activity for the UOR. As expected, the porous beta-Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets exhibit a large current density of up to 298 mA cm(-2) at 1.82 V (vs. RHE), which is roughly 18.1 times higher than that of the nonporous beta-Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets and even comparable to those of other high-performance catalysts under similar conditions. This work not only provides a promising guideline for the development of advanced UOR catalysts, but also highlights the crucial role of the porous structure in promoting the electrocatalytic UOR process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据