4.6 Article

Pillar iodination in functional boron cage hybrid supramolecular frameworks for high performance separation of light hydrocarbons

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 48, 页码 27560-27566

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta09928j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21908193, 21938011, 21725603]
  2. China Post-doctoral Science Foundation [2018M642434]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel ultramicroporous boron cage pillared supramolecular metal-organic framework BSF-2 comprising functional cluster undecahydro-iodo-closo-dodecaborate [B12H11I](2-) pillars is designed and prepared by supramolecular assembly of CuB12H11I and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)acetylene (bpa). The structure and properties of BSF-2 are fully characterized by single crystal X-ray analysis, powder X-ray analysis, IR spectroscopy, EPR spectroscopy and TGA. The gas adsorption study of BSF-2 indicates substantially enhanced isosteric heats of adsorption (Q(st)) for C3H8, C2H6, C2H2 and CO2 but an almost identical Q(st) for CH4 as a result of adding an iodo group to the dodecaborate pillars. Moreover, the C3H8 capacity on BSF-2 is increased while the CH4 uptake capacity is significantly reduced compared to parent BSF-1, leading to excellent separation selectivities for C3H8/CH4, C2H6/CH4, C2H2/CH4 and CO2/CH4. The gas adsorption behavior of C3H8, C2H2 and CH4 in BSF-2 is further revealed by modeling studies, indicating an enhanced affinity of BSF-2 towards C3H8 and C2H2 but a weak affinity towards CH4, consistent with the experimental results. In addition, the practical separation of a ternary C3H8/C2H6/CH4 gas mixture is investigated by recyclable dynamic breakthrough experiments. This work sheds light on designing high performance microporous materials for gas separation and provides new insights into understanding hydrocarbon adsorption/separation in supramolecular metal-organic frameworks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据