4.6 Article

Solution viscosity regulates chondrocyte proliferation and phenotype during 3D culture

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 7, 期 48, 页码 7713-7722

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9tb02204j

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [18K19947, 18K19945, 19H04475]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K19945] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells are surrounded by an extracellular matrix (ECM), which controls cellular functions through biological or physicochemical cues. In particular, cartilage tissues have abundant ECM that is viscoelastic and provides the necessary signals for the maintenance of chondrocyte activity and metabolism. The influence of ECM stiffness on chondrocyte functions has been broadly investigated using elastic hydrogels. However, it is not clear how viscosity impacts chondrocyte functions. In this study, a biphasic gelatin solution/hydrogel system was established for the three-dimensional culture of bovine articular chondrocytes (BACs) to investigate the influence of gelatin solution viscosity on chondrocyte proliferation, ECM secretion and the maintenance of the chondrocyte phenotype. Gelatin solutions of different viscosities supported chondrocyte proliferation and ECM production. However, the cell morphology, proliferation rate, secreted ECM quantity and gene expression levels were different, and these were dependent on the viscosity of the gelatin solutions. Low-viscosity solutions were more beneficial for proliferation, while high-viscosity solutions were more beneficial for ECM production and the expression of collagen type II and aggrecan. Chondrocytes had a more spread morphology in a low-viscosity gelatin solution than in a high-viscosity gelatin solution. The results suggested that high-viscosity was more beneficial for the maintenance of the chondrocyte phenotype, while low viscosity was more beneficial for cell expansion. Viscosity was demonstrated as one of the key parameters affecting cell morphology, proliferation and phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据