4.6 Article

Influence of Activation Methods on Strength and Chloride Resistance of Concrete Using Calcium Carbide Residue-Fly Ash Mixture as a New Binder

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001808

关键词

Fly ash; Calcium carbide residue; Compressive strength; Chloride resistance; Activation

资金

  1. Petchra Pra Jom Klao Ph.D. Scholarship, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
  2. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under TRF Grant for New Researcher Scholar [TRG 5780073]
  3. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under the TRF Senior Research Scholar [RTA5780004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research aimed to investigate the compressive strength and chloride resistance of concrete made with 30% of calcium carbide residue (CCR) and 70% fly ash (FA) as a binder without portland cement. There were three activation methods to promote strength development of a new cementing material: (1)adding 1% of NaOH by weight of binder; (2)curing concrete at elevated temperature of 60 degrees C; and (3)increasing the fineness of binder by grinding. All concretes were tested to determine the compressive strengths at 1, 3, 7, 28, and 90days. The chloride resistance of the concrete was also investigated at 28 and 90days. The results revealed that three activation methods used in this study could improve the compressive strength of concrete made from CCR and FA mixture, with more significant effects occurring at the early age than at the later age. Increasing the fineness of a new cementing material was found be the most effective method compared with the other methods. The compressive strength of concrete activated by increasing the fineness of a new cementing material could be as high as 55.0MPa at 28days and increased to 65.1MPa at 90days. Moreover, the chloride resistance of concrete in terms of the chloride ion penetration and corrosion resistance of reinforcing steel in concrete could be considerably improved by three activation methods used in this study. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据