4.5 Article

Parameter Identification of GTN Model Using Response Surface Methodology for High-Strength Steel BR1500HS

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-017-2806-4

关键词

damage; GTN model; numerical simulation; response surface methodology; ultra-high-strength steels

资金

  1. Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51605035]
  2. Beijing Finance Found of Science and Technology Planning Project [KZ201611232032, KM20161123200]
  3. young prominent talent projects [2014000026833ZK25]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to investigate the damage evolution of ultra-high-strength steels at different temperatures, a series of the uniaxial tensile tests were carried out at different temperatures (20-800 degrees C) with a constant true strain rate (1 s(-1)). And then, two different deformation mechanisms were employed to describe the flow behaviors of BR1500HS. It is found that dynamic recrystallization (DRX) occurs during the deformation process at high temperatures (600-800 degrees C), while the tensile flow behaviors exhibit a very long work hardening period before a short flow softening stages without DRX at lower temperatures of 20-400 degrees C Furthermore, the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) damage model was employed in this work to evaluate the ductile damage phenomena of BR1500HS. To determine the four vital parameters in GTN model, several numerical simulations were designed by central composite design and conducted by finite element simulation, and then the error evaluation functions (R) were established using four GTN parameters. Thereafter, the four parameters of GTN model were determined along with four minimum values of R by use of response surface methodology (RSM) and least square method. The results show that temperature affects the microvoid volume fraction significantly. Additionally, the parameters of GTN model were applied in the finite element simulation model and a comparison between the simulation results and the scanning electron microscopic observations was conducted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据