4.4 Article

Loss of benzaldehyde in the fragmentation of protonated benzoylamines: Benzoyl cation as a hydride acceptor in the gas phase

期刊

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 52, 期 10, 页码 664-671

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jms.3969

关键词

benzoyl cation; fragmentation mechanism; hydride acceptor; hydride transfer; loss of benzaldehyde

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21405137, 21605002]
  2. Innovative Research Team in Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [CAAS-ASTIP-2017-TRICAAS-7]
  3. Central Institute Basic Scientific Research Expenses Foundation [1610212016005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry of protonated 1-benzoylamines (1benzoylpiperadine, 1-benzoylmorpholine, and 1-benzoyl-4-methylpiperazine), the dominant fragmentation pathway was amide bond cleavage to form benzoyl cation and neutral amine. Meanwhile, in their fragmentations, an interesting loss of benzaldehyde (106 Da) was observed and identified to derive from hydride transfer reaction between the benzoyl cation and amine. A stepwise mechanism for loss of 106 Da (benzene and CO) could be excluded with the aid of deuterium labeling experiment. Theoretical calculations indicated that hydride transfers from amines (piperadine, morpholine, and 1-methylpiperazine) to benzoyl cation were thermodynamically permitted, and 1-methylpiperazine was the best hydride donor among the 3 amines. The mass spectrometric experimental results were consistent with the computational results. The relative abundance of the iminium cation (relative to the benzoyl cation) in the fragmentation of protonated 1-benzoyl-4-methylpiperazine was higher than that in the fragmentation of the other 2 protonated 1-benzoylamines. By comparing the fragmentations of protonated 1-benzyl-4methylpiperazine and protonated 1-benzoyl-4-methylpiperazine and the energetics of their hydride transfer reactions, this study revealed that benzoyl cation was a hydride acceptor in the gas phase, but which was weaker than benzyl cation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据