4.7 Article

Big data analytics based fault prediction for shop floor scheduling

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 187-194

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.008

关键词

Big data analytics; Fault prediction; Shop floor; Scheduling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51605121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current task scheduling mainly concerns the availability of machining resources, rather than the potential errors after scheduling. To minimise such errors in advance, this paper presents a big data analytics based fault prediction approach for shop floor scheduling. Within the context, machining tasks, machining resources, and machining processes are represented by data attributes. Based on the available data on the shop floor, the potential fault/error patterns, referring to machining errors, machine faults and maintenance states, are mined for unsuitable scheduling arrangements before machining as well as upcoming errors during machining. Comparing the data-represented tasks with the mined error patterns, their similarities or differences are calculated. Based on the calculated similarities, the fault probabilities of the scheduled tasks or the current machining tasks can be obtained, and they provide a reference of decision making for scheduling and rescheduling the tasks. By rescheduling high-risk tasks carefully, the potential errors can be avoided. In this paper, the architecture of the approach consisting of three steps in three levels is proposed. Furthermore, big data are considered in three levels, i.e. local data, local network data and cloud data. In order to implement this idea, several key techniques are illustrated in detail, e.g. data attribute, data cleansing, data integration of databases in different levels, and big data analytic algorithms. Finally, a simplified case study is described to show the prediction process of the proposed method. (C) 2017 The Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据