3.8 Article

Deflection characterisation of rotary systems using ground-based radar

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING-JOE
卷 2019, 期 20, 页码 7215-7219

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/joe.2019.0503

关键词

-

资金

  1. International Doctoral Innovation Centre
  2. Ningbo Education Bureau
  3. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau
  4. University of Nottingham
  5. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau as part of the International Academy for the Marine Economy and Technology (IAMET) project 'Structural Health Monitoring of Infrastructure in the Logistics Cycle' [2014A35008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the last two decades, an increase in large rotary machines/systems has been witnessed. To ensure safe operation of these systems especially due to extreme stress caused by centrifugal forces as well as the wind or water loadings, regular structural health monitoring (SHM) of the unbalanced parameters, particularly at the blade tips is necessary. For this, the use of non-contact sensors provides the most appropriate approach; however, millimetric out-of-plane deflection monitoring using non-contact sensors at distances >1 m has not been comprehensively addressed for rotary systems, like wind turbines. This study presents a modelling environment to simulate radar returns to analyse rotary systems. Employing Sammon mapping as a dimensionality reduction procedure in conjunction with 2D visualisation, the study demonstrates the characterisation of dynamic deflection parameters using a fast, portable ground-based interferometric radar (GBR). Comparisons between the GBR results with those of a Leica AR20 GPS indicate a divergence +/- 12.79 mm. The study utilises SHM framework to acquire, normalise, extract, and validate GBR signals within an SHM framework for structures under test or for deflection validation of the new system. Further, it contributes to the non-contact structural fatigue damage detection during design, testing, and operating stages of rotary structures blade tips.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据