4.6 Article

First-principles soft-mode lattice dynamics of PbZr0.5Ti0.5O3 and shortcomings of the virtual crystal approximation

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 100, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.224305

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/P022561/1, EP/P020194]
  2. UKCP consortium EPSRC [EP/P022561/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/P022561/1, 1783919, EP/P022103/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparative study of PbTiO3, PbZrO3, and the solid solution PbZr0.5Ti0.5O3 is performed on the soft-mode lattice dynamics within the first Brillouin zone. We consider the six unique B-site orderings for PbZr0.5Ti0.5O3 representable within the 2 x 2 x 2 primitive perovskite supercell as well as the virtual crystal approximation (VCA) to extract the phonon dispersion relations of a high-symmetry cubic-constrained form using density functional perturbation theory. We find that the most unstable modes in the rock-salt ordered structure and the VCA, like pure PbZrO3, are antiferrodistortive (AFD) while lower symmetry arrangements are dominated by F-point ferroelectric (FE) instabilities like pure PbTiO3. Despite similarities in the phonon dispersion relations between the rock-salt ordered supercell and the VCA, the character of modes at high symmetry points are found to be different. In particular, the a(0)a(0)c and a(0)a(0)c(+) AFD instabilities of the rock-salt ordering are replaced with a(-)b(-)c(-) and a(+)b(+)c(+) instabilities within the VCA. Such a rotation pattern is not seen in any of the supercell-based calculations, thus serving as a quantitative example of the inability of the method to accurately represent local structural distortions. Single modes are found exhibiting dual order parameters. At the zone center, some arrangements show mixed FE and antipolar soft modes (due to Pb motion transverse to the polar axis), and at long wavelengths all arrangements have soft modes of a mixed antipolar and AFD character. These are described with direct analysis of the eigendisplacements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据