4.6 Article

α-amylase binding to thermal plasma synthesized zinc oxide nanosheets: A fluorescence study

期刊

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 449-456

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2017.03.033

关键词

alpha-amylase; ZnO sheets; Thermodynamics and Fluorescence spectroscopy

类别

资金

  1. University Grant Commission-Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship (UGC-RGNF) [F1-17.1/2013-14/RGNF-2013-14-SC-MAH-51841/(SA-III)]
  2. University Grant Commission, Scheme under XII plan, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanosheets were synthesized using thermal plasma method, and characterized by X-ray diffraction and Transmission electron microscopy, to investigate their interaction with alpha-amylase at different pH, temperature and incubation time. Fluorescence quenching, synchronous and UV-visible spectroscopy were employed to establish the mechanism of interaction between ZnO nanosheets and alpha-amylase at different experimental condition. The obtained results confirmed that the ZnO nanosheets ( approximate to 25 nm) quench the fluorophore of alpha-amylase by forming ground state complex in the reaction mixture. The thermodynamic parameters were determined by using fluorescence quenching data. The free energy (Delta G degrees), enthalpy (Delta H degrees) and entropy (Delta S degrees) suggest that the binding process occurs spontaneously by involving hydrogen bond and van der Waals interaction. The synchronous spectra reveal that the microenvironment close to both tyrosine and tryptophan residues of alpha-amylase was perturbed and that the increased in hydrophobicity of both the residues in the presence of ZnO nanosheets. Resonance light scattering phenomenon suggests that alpha-amylase-ZnO complex are formed and conformational changes occurred in amylase. The changes in microenvironment around tyrosine and tryptophan suggest by synchronous and resonance light scattering spectra at various pH, temperature and incubation time. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据