4.6 Article

The DSHARP Rings: Evidence of Ongoing Planetesimal Formation?

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 884, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4423

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [714769]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [FOR 2634/1, SPP 1992, SPP 1833]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [17XRP17 2-0012]
  4. National Science Foundation [PHY-1607611, NSF PHY17-48958, PHY1607761]
  5. Munich Institute for Astro-and Particle Physics (MIAPP) of the DFG cluster of excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent high-resolution interferometric observations of protoplanetary disks at (sub)millimeter wavelengths reveal omnipresent substructures, such as rings, spirals, and asymmetries. A detailed investigation of eight rings detected in five disks by the DSHARP survey came to the conclusion that all rings are just marginally optically thick with optical depths between 0.2 and 0.5 at a wavelength of 1.25 mm. This surprising result could either be coincidental or indicate that the optical depth in all of the rings is regulated by the same process. We investigated if ongoing planetesimal formation could explain the fine-tuned optical depths in the DSHARP rings by removing dust and transforming it into invisible planetesimals. We performed a one-dimensional simulation of dust evolution in the second dust ring of the protoplanetary disk around HD 163296, including radial transport of gas and dust, dust growth and fragmentation, and planetesimal formation via gravitational collapse of sufficiently dense pebble concentrations. We show that planetesimal formation can naturally explain the observed optical depths if streaming instability regulates the midplane dust-to-gas ratio to unity. Furthermore, our simple monodisperse analytical model supports the hypothesis that planetesimal formation in dust rings should universally limit their optical depth to the observed range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据