4.5 Article

Comparison of behavior and microscopic characteristics of first and secondary explosions of coal dust

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.005

关键词

Secondary explosions; Explosive residue; SEM and EDS analysis; Pore structures

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017CXNL02]
  2. program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT13098]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differences in behaviors of primary and secondary explosions of a bituminous coal dust were investigated using a standard 20 L spherical test vessel. The aim was to compare the explosibility and microstructures of residues of first and secondary explosions to obtain reference data for investigation of accidental explosions. The residues were analyzed by energy-dispersive spectrometry, scanning electron microscopy, and automatic surface area and pore analyzer. The first explosion showed a higher rate of heat release and higher total heat release, which indicated greater severity of explosion. The spatial distributions of C, Cl, and Si in the residues were uniform, whereas those of Ca, O, and Al occurred as discrete points. The carbon content decreased and Ca, Al, Si, CI, and Fe contents increased as the reaction proceeded. Unexpectedly, the oxygen content was reduced by 4.41% during the primary explosion, but increased by 9.69% during the secondary explosion. The scanning electron microscopy picture of the secondary explosion residue exhibited a higher degree of fragmentation and a more developed pore structure. All isotherms of dust samples were of Type II and the shapes of the hysteresis loops were of Type H3 or Mixed Type H3-H4. Change of fractal dimension D2 illustrated increasingly complicated pore structures with advance of the explosion process. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据