4.7 Article

HDL Cholesterol and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Mendelian Randomization Study

期刊

DIABETES
卷 64, 期 9, 页码 3328-3333

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db14-1603

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council [09-063606, 10-081618]
  2. European Union [037631]
  3. COST Action [BM0904]
  4. Herlev Hospital
  5. Copenhagen University Hospital
  6. Research Fund at Rigshospitalet
  7. Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup's Fund (Copenhagen)
  8. Ingeborg and Leo Dannin's Grant
  9. Henry Hansen and Wife's Grant
  10. Danish Heart Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observationally, low levels of HDL cholesterol are consistently associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, plasma HDL cholesterol increasing has been suggested as a novel therapeutic option to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. Whether levels of HDL cholesterol are causally associated with type 2 diabetes is unknown. In a prospective study of the general population (n = 47,627), we tested whether HDL cholesterol-related genetic variants were associated with low HDL cholesterol levels and, in turn, with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. HDL cholesterol-decreasing gene scores and allele numbers associated with up to -13 and -20% reductions in HDL cholesterol levels. The corresponding theoretically predicted hazard ratios for type 2 diabetes were 1.44 (95% Cl 1.38-1.52) and 1.77 (1.61-1.95), whereas the genetic estimates were nonsignificant. Genetic risk ratios for type 2 diabetes for a 0.2 mmol/L reduction in HDL cholesterol were 0.91 (0.75-1.09) and 0.93 (0.78-1.11) for HDL cholesterol-decreasing gene scores and allele numbers, respectively, compared with the corresponding observational hazard ratio of 1.37 (1.32-1.42). In conclusion, genetically reduced HDL cholesterol does not associate with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, suggesting that the corresponding observational association is due to confounding and/or reverse causation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据