4.7 Article

Insulitis and -Cell Mass in the Natural History of Type 1 Diabetes

期刊

DIABETES
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 719-731

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db15-0779

关键词

-

资金

  1. JDRF [25-2013-268, 17-2012-3, 25-2012-516]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [UC4-DK-104155 01, 1DP3-DK-101120-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Descriptions of insulitis in human islets throughout the natural history of type 1 diabetes are limited. We determined insulitis frequency (the percent of islets displaying insulitis to total islets), infiltrating leukocyte subtypes, and -cell and -cell mass in pancreata recovered from organ donors with type 1 diabetes (n = 80), as well as from donors without diabetes, both with islet autoantibodies (AAb(+), n = 18) and without islet autoantibodies (AAb(-), n = 61). Insulitis was observed in four of four donors (100%) with type 1 diabetes duration of 1 year and two AAb(+) donors (2 of 18 donors, 11%). Insulitis frequency showed a significant but limited inverse correlation with diabetes duration (r = -0.58, P = 0.01) but not with age at disease onset. Residual -cells were observed in all type 1 diabetes donors with insulitis, while -cell area and mass were significantly higher in type 1 diabetes donors with insulitis compared with those without insulitis. Insulitis affected 33% of insulin(+) islets compared with 2% of insulin(-) islets in donors with type 1 diabetes. A significant correlation was observed between insulitis frequency and CD45(+), CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD20(+) cell numbers within the insulitis (r = 0.53-0.73, P = 0.004-0.04), but not CD68(+) or CD11c(+) cells. The presence of -cells as well as insulitis several years after diagnosis in children and young adults suggests that the chronicity of islet autoimmunity extends well into the postdiagnosis period. This information should aid considerations of therapeutic strategies seeking type 1 diabetes prevention and reversal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据