4.4 Review

Microphysiological systems modeling acute respiratory distress syndrome that capture mechanical force-induced injury-inflammation-repair

期刊

APL BIOENGINEERING
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5111549

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [HL136141, AG061687, HL126603, 5T32EB006343-08, 1R41HL140741]
  2. Office of the Assistance Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program [W81XWH-17-1-0443]
  3. Veterans Administration Health System Grant [1 I01 BX003919-01A1]
  4. Atlanta Pediatric Scholars Program [NICHD K12 HD072245]
  5. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1650114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex in vitro models of the tissue microenvironment, termed microphysiological systems, have enormous potential to transform the process of discovering drugs and disease mechanisms. Such a paradigm shift is urgently needed in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), an acute lung condition with no successful therapies and a 40% mortality rate. Here, we consider how microphysiological systems could improve understanding of biological mechanisms driving ARDS and ultimately improve the success of therapies in clinical trials. We first discuss how microphysiological systems could explain the biological mechanisms underlying the segregation of ARDS patients into two clinically distinct phenotypes. Then, we contend that ARDS-mimetic microphysiological systems should recapitulate three critical aspects of the distal airway microenvironment, namely, mechanical force, inflammation, and fibrosis, and we review models that incorporate each of these aspects. Finally, we recognize the substantial challenges associated with combining inflammation, fibrosis, and/or mechanical force in microphysiological systems. Nevertheless, complex in vitro models are a novel paradigm for studying ARDS, and they could ultimately improve patient care. (C) 2019 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据