4.7 Article

Design of 2D Nanocrystalline Fe2Ni2N Coated onto Graphene Nanohybrid Sheets for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 12, 页码 8502-+

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01434

关键词

transition metal nitride; graphene oxide; Prussian blue analogue; oxygen evaluation reaction; electrocatalysis

资金

  1. World Class 300 Project (RAMP
  2. D) of the MOTIE, MSS (Korea) [S2561932]
  3. Ministry of Trade
  4. Industry and Energy through Technology Innovation Program [10067449]
  5. Korea Technology & Information Promotion Agency for SMEs (TIPA) [S2561932] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report successfully synthesizing two-dimensional (2D) and nanocrystalline (NC) Fe2Ni2N/rGO nanohybrid sheets (NHSs) via ammonolysis of as-prepared 2D Ni2.25Fe0.75[Fe(CN)(6)](2)/rGO precursors. We compared the electrochemical properties of the 2D-NC Fe2Ni2N/rGO NHSs as non-precious-metal nitride and graphene nanohybrid electrocatalysts for an oxygen evolution reaction (OER) with those of NiFe-based composition. The overpotential and Tafel plot of the 2D-NC Fe2Ni2N/rGO NHSs had their lowest values of 290 and 49.1 mV dec(-1), respectively, at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) (0.1 M, KOH). The 2D-NC Fe2Ni2N/rGO NHS catalyst was stable under OER conditions, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy confirmed the stability of the catalysts after electrochemical testing (24 h). The synergistic interactions between the transition-metal nitride and graphene represent unique 2D nanostructured, metallic properties, and graphene sheets with nanocrystalline Fe2Ni2N on them are significantly more efficient and active electrocatalysts. The presented strategy of transition-metal nitride/graphene hybrid nanostructures provides potential for more efficient and outstanding OER electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据