4.7 Article

Functional Rescue of ABCC6 Deficiency by 4-Phenylbutyrate Therapy Reduces Dystrophic Calcification in Abcc6-/- Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 137, 期 3, 页码 595-602

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.10.035

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL108249, G12 MD007601, P30 GM103341, RR003061, RR016453, 15ADVC-74403]
  2. Hawaii Community Foundation [R01 AR055225]
  3. Hungarian grants [OTKA 114136, 104227, OTKA K111625]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soft-tissue calcification is associated with aging, common conditions such as diabetes or hypercholesterolemia, and with certain genetic disorders. ABCC6 is an efflux transporter primarily expressed in liver facilitating the release of adenosine triphosphate from hepatocytes. Within the liver vasculature, adenosine triphosphate is converted into pyrophosphate, a major inhibitor of ectopic calcification. ABCC6 mutations thus lead to reduced plasma pyrophosphate levels, resulting in the calcification disorder pseudoxanthoma elasticum and some cases of generalized arterial calcification of infancy. Most mutations in ABCC6 are missense, and many preserve transport activity but are retained intracellularly. We have previously shown that the chemical chaperone 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PBA) promotes the maturation of ABCC6 mutants to the plasma membrane. In a humanized mouse model of pseudoxanthoma elasticum, we investigated whether 4-PBA treatments could rescue the calcification inhibition potential of selected ABCC6 mutants. We used the dystrophic cardiac calcification phenotype of Abcc6(-/-) mice as an indicator of ABCC6 function to quantify the effect of 4-PBA on human ABCC6 mutants transiently expressed in the liver. We showed that 4-PBA administrations restored the physiological function of ABCC6 mutants, resulting in enhanced calcification inhibition. This study identifies 4-PBA treatment as a promising strategy for allele-specific therapy of ABCC6-associated calcification disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据