4.2 Article

Comparative study of the chemical composition, fatty acid profile, and nutritional quality of Lophiosilurus alexandri (Siluriformes: Pseudopimelodidae), a Brazilian carnivorous freshwater fish, grown in lotic, lentic, and aquaculture environments

期刊

NEOTROPICAL ICHTHYOLOGY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA ICTIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20190050

关键词

Dam; Feeding; Lipids; Pacama; Omega 3

类别

资金

  1. CAPES (Brazil) [270/11]
  2. FCT (Portugal)
  3. FAPESP (Brazil) [2013/10477-9]
  4. FAPEMIG (Brazil)
  5. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [308547/2018-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lophiosilurus alexandri is a carnivorous freshwater fish endemic of Sao Francisco basin and an endangered species. In this study, we analysed the chemical composition (moisture, protein, ash and lipid), fatty acid profile, and nutritional quality (atherogenic index, thrombogenecity index, ratio between hypocholesterolemic and hypercholesterolemic fatty acids and omega 6/omega 3 = ratio) of L. alexandri in lotic (river), lentic (hydroelectric dams) environments, under natural fed, and in laboratory controlled conditions fed with commercial diets. Cultured and lentic fish had significantly higher lipid levels (1.5 and 1.9- fold, respectively) than lotic fish. Lentic L. alexandri had significantly higher eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) levels (4x) than cultured or lotic L. alexandri. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels were the highest in lentic fish, followed by lotic fish. Lentic fish had greater proportion of fatty acid omega 6/omega 3 than lotic or cultured fish. The results of this study showed that L. alexandri is a lean fish (1-2% of total lipids) and that the environment has a great influence on the fatty acid profile. These results may be a reference for further studies, primarily as a source of information for conservation L. alexandri through restocking and the development of commercial projects of aquaculture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据