4.1 Article

Improved Bilateral Filtering for a Gaussian Pyramid Structure-Based Image Enhancement Algorithm

期刊

ALGORITHMS
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/a12120258

关键词

bilateral filtering; Gaussian down-sampling; luminance; enhancement; Retinex

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51179074]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2018J01495]
  3. Young and Middle-Aged Teachers Projects of Fujian Province [JAT170507, JAT170507(p)]
  4. Putian Science and Technology bureau project [2018RP4002]
  5. Modern Precision Measurement and Laser Nondestructive Testing [B17119]
  6. Doctoral Research Start-up Fund of Jimei University [ZQ2013007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To address the problem of unclear images affected by occlusion from fog, we propose an improved Retinex image enhancement algorithm based on the Gaussian pyramid transformation. Our algorithm features bilateral filtering as a replacement for the Gaussian function used in the original Retinex algorithm. Operation of the technique is as follows. To begin, we deduced the mathematical model for an improved bilateral filtering function based on the spatial domain kernel function and the pixel difference parameter. The input RGB image was subsequently converted into the Hue Saturation Intensity (HSI) color space, where the reflection component of the intensity channel was extracted to obtain an image whose edges were retained and are not affected by changes in brightness. Following reconversion to the RGB color space, color images of this reflection component were obtained at different resolutions using Gaussian pyramid down-sampling. Each of these images was then processed using the improved Retinex algorithm to improve the contrast of the final image, which was reconstructed using the Laplace algorithm. Results from experiments show that the proposed algorithm can enhance image contrast effectively, and the color of the processed image is in line with what would be perceived by a human observer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据