4.7 Article

The roles of inter-fuel substitution and inter-market contagion in driving energy prices: Evidences from China's coal market

期刊

ENERGY ECONOMICS
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104525

关键词

China's coal price; Inter-fuel substitution; Inter-market contagion; Crude oil market; International coal market

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71703120]
  2. Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China [17YJC790068]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M602784]
  4. Special Foundation of China Postdoctoral Science [2017T100729]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coal has been dominating energy supply and consumption in China, with the country becoming the largest energy supplier and consumer worldwide. Due to inter-fuel substitution of crude oil and inter-market contagion of international coal market, China's coal price might be interrelated with crude oil price and international coal price. However, the precise roles of these two effects in determining China's coal price are unknown. This paper contributes to previous literature by investigating this issue. We find that co-movements between China's coal price and crude oil price largely hinge on the shares of oil and coal in China's energy mix, while its co-movements with international coal price depend on scales of coal trade. Inter-fuel substitution dominated the interaction of China's coal market with other energy types, but the importance of inter-market contagion has been increasing. We also find that China might have become an originator for driving the returns of crude oil and international coal, in particular after 2008. Furthermore, China's coal market is still a net volatility recipient for shocks from both crude oil market and international coal market. Given the increased integration of global energy markets, we anticipate this paper to provide a better understanding on the dynamic changes in China's coal prices. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据