4.6 Article

Aliovalent substitution toward reinforced structural rigidity in Ce3+-doped garnet phosphors featuring improved performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 7, 期 46, 页码 14594-14600

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9tc05354a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51722202, 51972118]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Science & Technology Project [2018A050506004]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [D2190980]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly efficient phosphors with thermal stability and color-tunable emission are required for the fabrication of phosphor-converted white light-emitting diodes (pc-WLEDs). Currently developed engineering strategies are generally successful in photoluminescence tuning but, unfortunately, suffer severe deterioration in emission intensity/efficiency and/or thermal stability. Herein, an efficient aliovalent substitution strategy toward reinforced structural rigidity is proposed and demonstrated experimentally. By incorporating Be2+ ion into the garnet-type Lu2SrAl4SiO12:Ce3+ phosphor, the phosphor shows enhanced internal/external quantum efficiency, from 79.2%/26.7% to 84.5%/32.9%, photoluminescence tuning from green (peaking at similar to 512 nm) to yellow (peaking at similar to 552 nm), and zero thermal quenching, even up to 200 degrees C. The Be2+ substitution at the Al-2/Si-2 site enables stable and rigid local surroundings around the Ce3+ activator, which is responsible for the unprecedented performance. In addition, high-quality warm WLED devices with a luminous efficiency of 158.1 lm W-1, correlated color temperature of 3858 K and high color rendering index of 81.7, are obtained by combining Lu2SrAl4SiO12:Ce3+,Be2+ as the yellow emitter, CaAlSiN3:Eu2+ as the red emitter and a blue-emitting InGaN chip. These findings highlight a new strategy for performance optimization of LED phosphors by selecting rigid covalent compounds with further reinforced structural rigidity via aliovalent substitution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据