4.4 Article

Hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators based on global vision

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 193-206

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-161454

关键词

Bonferroni mean; hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; HFLGRWBM operator; HFLRWBM operator; HFLWPBM operator; interrelationship

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11171221]
  2. Education Department of Anhui Province Natural Science Key Research Projects [KJ2016A742]
  3. Anhui Province College Excellent Young Talents Support Plan Key Projects [gxyq2017058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set is an efficient tool for modeling quantitative information. In recent years, hesitant fuzzy linguistic information aggregation operators have increasingly attracted the attention of scholars. However, most of the existing operators assume that aggregated elements are independent, which overlooks the interconnectedness between elements in decision making situations. In this paper, we introduce several tools for integrating hesitant fuzzy linguistic variables, such as the hesitant fuzzy linguistic reducible weighted Bonferroni mean (HFLRWBM) operator, the hesitant fuzzy linguistic generalized reducible weighted Bonferroni mean (HFLGRWBM) operator, and the hesitant fuzzy linguistic weighted power Bonferroni mean (HFLWPBM) operator. These operators take into consideration the influences of two factors: the relative importance of each individual criterion and the interaction relationships between the values. It should be noted that the HFLWPBM operator is suitable for dealing with hesitant fuzzy linguistic evaluated information provided by decision makers are fused. In addition, several special forms of these operators are investigated, and their properties and advantages are discussed. Using these operators, this paper proposed a method for multiple attribute decision making. The feasibility and validity of this approach are demonstrated using a number of examples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据