3.8 Article

Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of IgG4-Related Periaortitis/Periarteritis and Retroperitoneal Fibrosis Diagnosed Based on Experts' Diagnosis

期刊

ANNALS OF VASCULAR DISEASES
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 460-472

出版社

ANNALS VASCULAR DISEASES EDITORIAL OFFICE
DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.19-00085

关键词

IgG4-related disease; organ-specific diagnostic criteria; periaortitis/periarteritis; retroperitoneal fibrosis

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IgG4-related disease is a systemic disease, characterized by elevation of serum IgG4 and, histopathologically, massive infiltration of IgG4+ lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration, storiform fibrosis, causing enlargement, nodules or thickening. It may affect various organs simultaneously or meta-chronously. Here we analyzed the clinical and pathological characteristics of 99 patients diagnosed with IgG4-related periaortitis/periarteritis and retroperitoneal fibrosis. Of 99 patients (women/men, 15/84; mean age 67.3 +/- 9.5 years), 33 were diagnosed based on the histopathological findings of perivascular/retroperitoneal lesions, 50 were diagnosed based on the characteristic imaging findings of perivascular/ retroperitoneal lesions and the presence of definitive IgG4-related disease in other organ(s), and the remaining 16 patients were diagnosed by experts based on the characteristic imaging findings of perivascular/retroperitoneal legions, serological findings, response to glucocorticoid treatment, and/or the presence of suspected IgG4-related disease in other organ(s). According to the new organ-specific criteria proposed by experts, 73 (73.7%) diagnoses were categorized to be definitive, and 6 (6.1%) and 17 (17.2%) diagnoses were categorized to be probable and possible, respectively. Further analyses are needed to clarify the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategy of IgG4-related periaortitis/periarteritis and retroperitoneal fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据