4.7 Article

Characterization of the soybean GmALMT family genes and the function of GmALMT5 in response to phosphate starvation

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 216-231

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12604

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030312009]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31672220, U1301212, 31422046]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFD0100700]
  4. Guangdong High-level Personnel of Special Support Program [2015TX01N042, 2015TQ01N078]
  5. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2015A030306034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A potential mechanism to enhance utilization of sparingly soluble forms of phosphorus (P) is the root secretion of malate, which is mainly mediated by the ALMT gene family in plants. In this study, a total of 34 GmALMT genes were identified in the soybean genome. Expression patterns diverged considerably among GmALMTs in response to phosphate (Pi) starvation in leaves, roots and flowers, with expression altered by P availability in 26 of the 34 GmALMTs. One root-specific GmALMT whose expression was significantly enhanced by Pi-starvation, GmALMT5, was studied in more detail to determine its possible role in soybean P nutrition. Analysis of GmALMT5 tissue expression patterns, subcellular localization, and malate exudation from transgenic soybean hairy roots overexpressing GmALMT5, demonstrated that GmALMT5 is a plasma membrane protein that mediates malate efflux from roots. Furthermore, both growth and P content of transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GmALMT5 were significantly increased when sparingly soluble Ca-P was used as the external P source. Taken together, these results indicate that members of the soybean GmALMT gene family exhibit diverse responses to Pi starvation. One member of this family, GmALMT5, might contribute to soybean P efficiency by enhancing utilization of sparingly soluble P sources under P limited conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据