4.7 Article

The polyketide synthase OsPKS2 is essential for pollen exine and Ubisch body patterning in rice

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 9, 页码 612-628

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12574

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0101107]
  2. National Key Basic Research Developments Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB126902]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31322040, 31670309]
  4. Innovative Research Team of the Ministry of Education
  5. 111 Project [B14016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid and phenolic metabolism are important for pollen exine formation. In Arabidopsis, polyketide synthases (PKSs) are essential for both sporopollenin biosynthesis and exine formation. Here, we characterized the role of a polyketide synthase (OsPKS2) in male reproduction of rice (Oryza sativa). Recombinant OsPKS2 catalyzed the condensation of fatty acyl-CoA with malonyl-CoA to generate triketide and tetraketide -pyrones, the main components of pollen exine. Indeed, the ospks2 mutant had defective exine patterning and was male sterile. However, the mutant showed no significant reduction in sporopollenin accumulation. Compared with the WT (wild type), ospks2 displayed unconfined and amorphous tectum and nexine layers in the exine, and less organized Ubisch bodies. Like the pksb/lap5 mutant of the Arabidopsis ortholog, ospks2 showed broad alterations in the profiles of anther-related phenolic compounds. However, unlike pksb/lap5, in which most detected phenolics were substantially decreased, ospks2 accumulated higher levels of phenolics. Based on these results and our observation that OsPKS2 is unable to fully restore the exine defects in the pksb/lap5, we propose that PKS proteins have functionally diversified during evolution. Collectively, our results suggest that PKSs represent a conserved and diversified biochemical pathway for anther and pollen development in higher plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据