3.8 Proceedings Paper

ECGNET: Learning Where to Attend for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation with Deep Visual Attention

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/bhi.2019.8834637

关键词

Atrial fibrillation; ECG analysis; deep learning; attention mechanism

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1657260]
  2. National Institute On Minority Health And Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health [U54MD012388]
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1657260] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complexity of the patterns associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and the high level of noise affecting these patterns have significantly limited the application of current signal processing and shallow machine learning approaches to accurately detect this condition. Deep neural networks have shown to be very powerful to learn the non-linear patterns in various problems such as computer vision tasks. While deep learning approaches have been utilized to learn complex patterns related to the presence of AF in electrocardiogram (ECG) signals, they can considerably benefit from knowing which parts of the signal is more important to focus on during learning. In this paper, we introduce a two-channel deep neural network to more accurately detect the presence of AF in the ECG signals. The first channel takes in an ECG signal and automatically learns where to attend for detection of AF. The second channel simultaneously takes in the same ECG signal to consider all features of the entire signal. Besides improving detection accuracy, this model can guide the physicians via visualization that what parts of the given ECG signal are important to attend while trying to detect atrial fibrillation. The experimental results confirm that the proposed model significantly improves the performance of AF detection on well-known MIT-BIH AF database with 5-s ECG segments (achieved a sensitivity of 99.53 %, specificity of 99.26% and accuracy of 99.40%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据