4.4 Article

Prediction of Flexible Pavement Deterioration in Relation to Climate Change Using Fuzzy Logic

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000363

关键词

Adaptation; Climate change; Flexible pavement; Fuzzy logic; Infrastructure

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIP) [NRF-2014R1A2A1A11052499, 2011-0030040]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0030040, 2014R1A2A1A11052499] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An understanding of the impacts of climate change on infrastructure is important in the context of reducing future socioeconomic losses. Previous research has introduced models based on empirical and mechanical analyses to predict the behavior of infrastructure considering climate change. However, the uncertainty and unavailability of information regarding climate change prevent the widespread use of these previous models. This paper presents a method for developing a climate impact-assessment system using fuzzy inferences to predict the alteration of infrastructure service life. Fuzzy inferences enable an understanding of the impacts of climate on infrastructure, with expert knowledge reflecting the interactions between multiple environmental factors. Based on the proposed method, the impacts of climate change on infrastructure can be analyzed by obtaining an expected service life with respect to various climate scenarios. A case study was conducted on a flexible pavement road in Alabama to show the applicability and utility of the method. The proposed method is expected to improve infrastructure management and planning practices, establishing proactive adaptation strategies to minimize additional infrastructure expenditure and damage. (c) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据