4.4 Article

Hidden-Model Processes for Adaptive Management under Uncertain Climate Change

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000376

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF project CMMI [1638327]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predictions of climate change can significantly affect the optimization of measures reducing the long-term risk for assets exposed to extreme events. Although a single climate model can be represented by a Markov stochastic process and directly integrated into the sequential decision-making procedure, optimization under epistemic uncertainty about the model is computationally more challenging. Decision makers have to define not only a set of models with corresponding probabilities, but also whether and how they will learn more about the likelihood of these models during the asset-management process. Different assumed learning rates about the climate can suggest opposite behaviors. For example, an agent believing, optimistically, that the correct model will soon be identified may prefer to wait for this information before making relevant decisions; on the other hand, an agent predicting, pessimistically, that no further information will ever be available may prefer to immediately take actions with long-term consequences. This paper proposes a set of optimization procedures based on the Markov decision process (MDP) framework to support decision making depending on the assumed learning rate, thus trading off the need for a prompt response with that for reducing uncertainty before deciding. Specifically, it outlines how approaches based on the MDP and hidden-mode MDPs, dynamic programming, and point-based value iteration can be used, depending on the assumptions on future learning. The paper describes the complexity of these procedures, discusses their performance in different settings, and applies them to flood risk mitigation. (c) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据