4.7 Article

Zika Virus Structure, Maturation, and Receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 S935-S944

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix515

关键词

cryo-EM; maturation; neutralizing antibodies; receptors; Zika virus

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01AI073755]
  2. NIH [NIGMS P41-GM103311]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of Zika virus (ZIKV) as a major public health threat has focused research on understanding virus biology and developing a suite of strategies for disease intervention. Recent advances in cryoelectron microscopy have accelerated structure-function studies of flaviviruses and of ZIKV in particular. Structures of the mature and immature ZIKV have demonstrated its similarity with other known flaviviruses such as dengue and West Nile viruses. However, ZIKV's unique pathobiology demands an explanation of how its structure, although similar to its flavivirus relatives, is sufficiently unique to address questions of receptor specificity, transmission, and antigenicity. Progress in defining the immunodominant epitopes and how neutralizing antibodies bind to them will provide great insight as vaccines progress through clinical trials. Identification of host receptors will substantially illuminate the interesting ZIKV tropism and provide insights into pathogenesis. Although the answers to all of these questions are not yet available, rapid progress in combining structural biology with other techniques is revealing the similarities and the differences in virion structure and function between ZIKV and related flaviviruses.This review article describes the structure of mature and immature ZIKV in the context of related flaviviruses and provides insights into the antibody interactions and receptor usage of the virus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据