4.7 Review

Effectiveness of influenza vaccines in preventing severe influenza illness among adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design case-control studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 75, 期 5, 页码 381-394

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.09.010

关键词

Influenza; Vaccine effectiveness; Hospitalization; Adults; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Intramural CDC HHS [CC999999] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Summary evidence of influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against hospitalized influenza is lacking. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies reporting IVE against laboratory-confirmed hospitalized influenza among adults. Methods: We searched Pubmed (January 2009 to November 2016) for studies that used test-negative design (TND) to enrol patients hospitalized with influenza-associated conditions. Two independent authors selected relevant articles. We calculated pooled IVE against any and (sub) type specific influenza among all adults, and stratified by age group (18-64 and 65 years and above) using random-effects models. Results: We identified 3411 publications and 30 met our inclusion criteria. Between 2010-11 and 2014-15, the pooled seasonal IVE was 41% (95% CI: 34; 48) for any influenza (51% (95% CI: 44; 58) among people aged 18-64y and 37% (95% CI: 30; 44) among >= 65 years). IVE was 48% (95% CI: 37; 59), 37% (95% CI: 24; 50) and 38% (95% CI: 23; 53) against influenza A(H1N1) pdm09, A(H3N2) and B, respectively. Among persons aged >= 65 year, IVE against A(H3N2) was 43% (95% CI: 33; 53) in seasons when circulating and vaccine strains were antigenically similar and 14% (95% CI:-3; 30) when A(H3N2) variant viruses predominated. Conclusions: Influenza vaccines provided moderate protection against influenza-associated hospitalizations among adults. They seemed to provide low protection among elderly in seasons where vaccine and circulating A(H3N2) strains were antigenically variant. (C) 2017 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据