4.7 Article

Correlation of altered expression of a long non-coding RNA, NEAT1, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with dengue disease progression

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 75, 期 6, 页码 541-554

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.09.016

关键词

LncRNAs; NEAT1; IFI27; Severe dengue

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India [BT/PR8597/MED/29/764/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The association of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) with dengue disease progression is currently unknown. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify lncRNAs in different categories of dengue patients and evaluate their association with dengue disease progression. Herein, we examined the expression profiles of lncRNAs and protein-coding genes between other febrile illness (OFI) and different grade of dengue patients through high-throughput RNA sequencing. We identified Nuclear Enriched Abundant Transcript 1 (NEAT1) as one of the differentially expressed lncRNAs (adjusted P <= 0.05 and log-fold change >= 2) and subsequently validated the expression by qRT-PCR. The co-expression analysis further revealed that NEAT1 and the coding gene IFI27 were highly co-expressed and negatively correlated with dengue severity. Using regression analysis, we observed that NEAT1 expression was significantly dependent on disease progression (Coefficient = -0.27750, SE Coefficient = 0.07145, and t = -3.88). Further, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve revealed that NEAT1 expression could discriminate DI from DS (sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 85.69 - 97.22) and area under the curve (AUC) = 0.97). Overall, the results of this study offer the first experimental evidence demonstrating the correlation between lncRNAs and severe dengue phenotype. Monitoring NEAT1 and IFI27 expression in PBMC may be useful in understanding dengue virus-induced disease progression. (C) 2017 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据