4.6 Review

A review on the mechanical properties for thin film and block structure characterised by using nanoscratch test

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 628-644

出版社

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1515/ntrev-2019-0055

关键词

nanoscratch; thin film; polymer composite; concrete; critical load; adhesion strength; interfacial property; nanoindentation

资金

  1. General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978409]
  2. International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51120185002]
  3. Science and Technology Foundation for the Basic Research Plan of Shenzhen City [JCYJ20160422095146121]
  4. Science and Technology Key Project of Guangdong Province, China [2019B111107002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nanoscratch test has been identified as one of the important tools for evaluating the mechanical and tribological properties of materials. This paper reviews the current researches on the nanoscratch test using to characterise the mechanical properties of three typical materials, including thin film, polymer composite and concrete, from the perspectives of the Berkovich indenter, parameter selection, mode selection, and analysis of resulting data. In addition, to provide a deep understanding on the test from different magnitude, a comparison between the microscratch test and nanoscratch test on the evaluation of tribological performance is also provided in this paper. The characterisation by nanoscratch test of two structural samples, in terms of layered film structures (thin film and coating sample) and single layer block structure (polymer composite sample and concrete samples) are also described in this paper, which aims to provides a deep understand on the evaluation the adhesion, tribological and interfacial properties of the typical materials samples by nanoscratch test. Finally, the coefficient of friction and critical load are discussed, which are two important parameters in tribological properties and adhesion properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据