4.1 Article

Evaluation of Oxalobacter formigenes DSM 4420 biodegradation activity for high oxalate media content: An in vitro model

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101378

关键词

Biodegradation; O. formigenes DSM 4420; Oxalate; High concentration; Probiotics; Response surface method; Algorithmic genetic technique

资金

  1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences [14956]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxalate is a common component of many foods typically present as a salt of oxalic acid, which will be excreted in the urine. Hyperoxaluria is known to be a considerable risk factor for umlithiasis, and formation of oxalate kidney stone. Oxalate degradation by the probiotic anaerobic bacterium Oxalobacter formigenes DSM 4420 has high yield and efficiency both in the human colon helping to prevent hyperoxaluria and disorders such as the development of kidney stones and as a novel approach in reducing the high concentration of foodstuff oxalate content such as tea, coffee, and nuts. For determining the effective factors to enhance high concentration oxalate biodegradation activity of Oxalobacter formigenes DSM 4420 Plackett-Burman screening design was applied to evaluate the impact of 10 process variables. After determining the main factors by screening design, a response surface methodology was used to find suitable treatment combination for oxalate biodegradation by this pro biotic. A second-order quadratic model estimated that the highest biodegradation of 60.2% was achieved in presence of 1.35 (g/L) inulin, 36.56 (g/L) glucose, 26 (mmol/L) ammonium oxalate, and pH 6. In other word, the optimum point showed that in the above condition the high concentration of ammonium oxalate content of 26 mmoL/L will reach to 9.95 mmoL/L. Reconfirmation experiment showed the validity of predicted optimum conditions. A surface model using the RSM and optimizing this model using the GA technique, resulted in a useful method of finding an optimal set of process parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据