4.4 Article

Genomic analysis reveals rich genetic variation and potential targets of selection during domestication of castor bean from perennial woody tree to annual semi-woody crop

期刊

PLANT DIRECT
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/pld3.173

关键词

castor bean; domestication selection; genetic variation; seed storage lipids; woody tree

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31661143002, 31771839, 31970341, 31701123]
  2. Yunnan Applied Basic Research Projects [2016FA011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Relatively, little is known about the genetic variation of woody trees during domestication. Castor bean (Ricinus communis L. Euphorbiaceae) is a commercially important nonedible annual oilseed crop and differs from its wild progenitors that have a perennial woody habit. Although castor bean is one of the oldest cultivated crops, its domestication origin, genomic variation, and potential targets of selection underlying domestication traits remain unknown. Here, we performed a phylogenetic analysis, which suggests that the wild accessions were distinctively separated from the cultivated accessions. Genome sequencing of three accessions (one each wild, landrace, and cultivar) showed a large number of genetic variants between wild and cultivated castor bean (ZB306 or Hale), and relatively few variants between cultivar ZB306 and Hale. Comparative genome analysis revealed many candidate genes of selection and key pathways potentially involved in the transition from a perennial woody tree to annual crop. Interestingly, among 16 oil-related genes only three showed evidence of selection and the remainder showed low genetic variation at the population level, suggesting strong purifying selection in both the wild and domesticated gene pools. These results extend our understanding of the origin, genomic variation, and domestication, and provide a valuable resource for future gene-trait associations and castor bean breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据