3.8 Proceedings Paper

Kindling the Darkness: A Practical Low-light Image Enhancer

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3343031.3350926

关键词

low light enhancement; image decomposition; image restoration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772512]
  2. CCF-Tencent Open Research Fund
  3. National Social Science Fundation of China [15XMZ057]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [61702359]
  5. Basic Applied Research Project of Science and Technology Department of Qinghai Province of China [2015-ZJ-718]
  6. Key R&D and transformation project of Qinghai Province of China [2019-GX-162]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Images captured under low-light conditions often suffer from (partially) poor visibility. Besides unsatisfactory lightings, multiple types of degradations, such as noise and color distortion due to the limited quality of cameras, hide in the dark. In other words, solely turning up the brightness of dark regions will inevitably amplify hidden artifacts. This work builds a simple yet effective network for Kindling the Darkness (denoted as KinD), which, inspired by Retinex theory, decomposes images into two components. One component (illumination) is responsible for light adjustment, while the other (reflectance) for degradation removal. In such a way, the original space is decoupled into two smaller subspaces, expecting to be better regularized/learned. It is worth to note that our network is trained with paired images shot under different exposure conditions, instead of using any ground-truth reflectance and illumination information. Extensive experiments are conducted to demonstrate the efficacy of our design and its superiority over state-of-the-art alternatives. Our KinD is robust against severe visual defects, and user-friendly to arbitrarily adjust light levels. In addition, our model spends less than 50ms to process an image in VGA resolution on a 2080Ti GPU. All the above merits make our KinD attractive for practical use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据