4.5 Article

Does a tailored intervention to promote adherence in patients with chronic lung disease affect exacerbations? A randomized controlled trial

期刊

RESPIRATORY RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1219-3

关键词

Chronic disease management; Compliance; Randomised controlled trial; Reminders

资金

  1. Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
  2. Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMW), Bern, Switzerland
  3. Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft (FAG), Basel, Switzerland
  4. Swiss Lung League, Berne, Switzerland
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH Switzerland
  6. Astra Zeneca AG Switzerland
  7. Mundipharma AG Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Poor medication-adherence is common in chronic lung patients, resulting in reduced health-outcomes and increased healthcare-costs. This study aimed to investigate the impact of an acoustic reminder and support calls on adherence to inhaled therapy in asthma and COPD patients and to determine their effect on exacerbations. Methods: This single-blinded randomized controlled trial investigated asthma and COPD patients during 6 months in an ambulatory setting. The intervention consisted of daily alarm clock and support phone calls, whenever use of rescue medication doubled or inhaled medication was not taken as prescribed. Primary outcome was time to next exacerbation. Frequency of exacerbations, adherence to inhaled medication and quality of life scores were secondary outcomes. Cox and Poisson regression were used to determine intervention effect on time to exacerbation and frequency of exacerbations, respectively. Results: Seventy-five participants were assigned to the intervention group and 74 to usual follow-up care. During a median follow-up of 6.2months, 22 and 28% in the intervention and control groups respectively, experienced at least one exacerbation. Intervention had no effect on time to first exacerbation (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.07, P = .24), but showed a trend toward a 39% decreased frequency of exacerbations (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.03, P = .070) for the adjusted models, respectively. The intervention group had significantly more days with 80-100% taking adherence regarding puff inhalers (82 +/- 14% vs. 60 +/- 30%, P < .001) and dry powder capsules (90 +/- .10% vs. 80 +/- 21%, P =.01). Timing adherence in participants using puff inhalers was higher in the intervention group (69 +/- 25% vs. 51 +/- 33%, P <.001). No significant differences in QoL were found between the two groups. Conclusion: Participants assigned to the intervention group had significantly better taking and timing adherence of inhaled medication resulting in a trend towards a decreased frequency of exacerbations. However, no effect on time to next exacerbation was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据