4.6 Article

Nur77 Regulates Nondeletional Mechanisms of Tolerance in T Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 199, 期 9, 页码 3147-3157

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701085

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 86595]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Negative selection against highly self-reactive thymocytes is critical for preventing autoimmunity. Thymocyte deletion, anergy induction, and agonist selection are all forms of negative selection that can occur following a high-affinity TCR signal. Of Bim and Nur77, two TCR-induced proteins with proapoptotic function, Bim has been shown to be important for clonal deletion in several model systems, whereas Nur77 was often dispensable. However, Nur77 has been reported to influence other aspects of T cell development by mechanisms that may not be related to its proapoptotic function. In this study, we examined the role of Nur77 during thymocyte development in the presence and absence of Bim to separate apoptotic from nonapoptotic functions of Nur77. Polyclonal Bim(-/-) and Bim(-/-) Nur77(-/-) mice exhibited comparable accumulation of high-affinity signaled CD4(+) CD8(+) double-positive thymocytes and CD8(+) and CD4(+) single-positive thymocytes. However, combined Bim and Nur77 deficiency increased the frequency of thymic Foxp3(+) T regulatory cells and Foxp(3-) FR4(hi) CD73(hi) anergic phenotype CD4(+) T cells compared with Bim(-/-) mice, suggesting that Nur77 expression impairs the development of nonconventional tolerance-inducing cell fates. Using the OT-I RIP-mOVA model, we found that Nur77 deficiency did not substantially impact clonal deletion nor did it exacerbate the defect in clonal deletion in the absence of Bim. However, additional loss of Nur77 in the absence of Bim led to diabetes induction, suggesting that Nur77 promotes tolerance in this context. Together, these data reveal novel nondeletional roles for Nur77 that differ between T cell subsets and have implications for self-tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据