4.1 Article

Online image databases as multi-purpose resources: discovery of a new host ant of Rickia wasmannii Cavara (Ascomycota, Laboulbeniales) by screening AntWeb.org

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYMENOPTERA RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 85-94

出版社

PENSOFT PUBL
DOI: 10.3897/jhr.61.20255

关键词

Biological collections; database; Myrmica hellenica; distribution; Greece

资金

  1. 'AntLab' Marie Curie Career Integration Grant, part the 7th European Community Framework Programme
  2. 'Bolyai Janos' scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA)
  3. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities of Hungary [NKP-16-4-IV]
  4. European Union
  5. European Social Fund
  6. [EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public awareness has been raised on the importance of natural history and academic collections for science and society in a time when reduced financial support and staff cuts are prevalent. In the field of biology, new species and new interspecies associations are constantly discovered by making use of museum collections, digitalised materials or citizen science programs. In our study, the Myrmica Latreille, 1804 image collection of AntWeb. org was screened for fungal ectoparasites. A total of 397 imaged specimens from 133 species were visually investigated. A single specimen of M. hellenica Finzi, 1926, collected in Greece by U. Sahlberg, showed a conspicuous fungal infection. The parasite was identified using microscopic methods as Rickia wasmannii Cavara, an ectoparasitic fungal species specialised to Myrmica ants. This finding represents a new country record and a new Myrmica species for the host spectrum of R. wasmannii. According to our results, online entomological databases can be screened relatively easily for ectoparasitic fungal infections from new hosts and new regions. However, depending on quality of the insect voucher photos, additional investigation of the material could be needed to confirm the identity of the parasite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据